Introduction
- Under Direct Tax Laws, tax authorities have been given powers to
make tax payers comply with their tax obligations and to investigate
those who do not. Tax authorities have discretion to make best
judgement assessment and to pass orders as they may
think fit in the circumstances of the case.
- Exercise of such powers and discretion by tax authorities is
likely to generate tax payer grievances on ground either that the
tax authority misunderstood the law or incorrectly inferred facts or
misapplied the law to the facts of the case. Grievance that the tax
authority had not afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing to
the tax payer may also be voiced.
- In case of obvious or prime facie mistakes, the tax payer can
approach the concerned authority for rectification of the order.
Such mistakes may be as to facts as well as of law.
- The tax payer can also approach the Commissioner of Income-tax
for revision of the orders of the authority administratively
subordinate to him where he does not file appeal against this order.
- In order that the tax payers have confidence in the fair play,
credibility and impartiality of the tax administration, Direct Tax
laws have provided for independent appellate for independent
appellate fora.
^Top
|
First appeal to commissioner (Appeals)
- Any assessee aggrieved by the adjustments to the tax or interest
in the intimation sent to him or by the order of assessment, penalty
or rectification made by an Assessing (Appeals).
- Free at the following rate is payable for filing the appeal
before Commissioner (Appeals) :
Assessed total income
Rs.1 lakh or less Rs.250/-
Assessed total income more than
Rs.1 lakh but not more than 2 lakh Rs.500/-
Appeals involving total assessed income
More than Rs.2 lakhs Rs.1000/-
Appeals involving any other matter Rs.500/-
|
There is a prescribed from for filing the appeal (Form No.35). The
form should be signed by the assessee. The grounds of appeal and the
statement of facts are also required to be filed along with Memorandum of
appeal.
Appeal must be filed within thirty days from the date of receipt of the
relevant order. In appropriate cases where the delay is for good reasons,
Commissioner (Appeals) can condone the delay. The appeal is admitted for
hearing only if at the time of filing of appeal the assessee has paid the
tax due on income returned.
Once the appeal is filed, it can be withdrawn only with the permission of
the Appellate Authority. Normally the assessee cannot file additional
evidence or evidence not led in before the Assessing Officer before
Commissioner (Appeals). In case where the Appellate authority wants to admit
this additional evidence, an opportunity to examine this additional evidence
is given by the authority to the Assessing Officer.
Commissioner (Appeals) has power of enhancing the assessed income or
penalty. Commissioner (Appeals) can remand a case to an Assessing Officer to
enquire and furnish a report on specified matters.
Commissioner (Appeals) makes a reasoned order in writing after giving
opportunity for hearing to the appellant and the Assessing Officer. Where
possible, Commissioner (Appeals) will hear and decide appeal within a period
of one year from the end of his financial year in which appeal is filed.
In respect of appeals under Wealth-tax Act to Commissioner (Appeals), fee
of Rs.250/- is payable. Appeals is required to be filed in Form No.E of
Wealth Tax Rules. APPEALS AGAINST ORDERS RELATING TO UNDISCLOSED INCOME FO
^Top
Block period
- In respect of search initiated on or after January 1, 1997,
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is the first Appellate
Authority against block assessment orders or penalty for under
declaration of undisclosed income in the return of income for the
block period. In these case second appeal will lie to the Tribunal.
- In case of block assessment in respect of search initiated after
30th June, 1995 and before 1st January, 1997, first appeal lie
before the Tribunal.
|
^Top
Second appeal to Appellate Tribual
An assessee aggrieved by the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) can file
further appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. He can also file appeal with the
Tribunal against the order of revision or rectification prejudicial to him
or an order refusing to grant registration to a Charitable Trust made by
Commissioner of Income-tax.
The appeal is required to be filed in the prescribed Form No.36. The Form
under Wealth-tax Rules is Form No.F.
Fee at the following rate is payable for filing appeal before the Tribunal
from 1st October, 1998;
Assessed total income is Rs.500/-
Rs.1 lakh or less
Assessed total income more than Rs.1500/-
Rs.1 lakh but less than Rs.2 lakhs
Assessed total income Rs.2 lakhs or more Rs.1% of assessed income
Subject to a maximum of Rs.10,000/-
Appeals under other Direct Rs.1000/-
Taxes Miscellaneous applications
U/s.254(2) Rs.50/-
Stay petitions Rs.500/-
Appeals involving any other matters Rs.500/-
The appeal has to be filed within sixty days from the date of receiving the
relevant order. The Memorandum of appeal should be accompanied by grounds of
appeal, statement of facts and a paperbook containing the relevant orders
and statements, documents referred to in the order and proposed to be relied
upon at the time of hearing of the appeal.
Normally a bench of the Tribunal which consists of one Judicial Member and
one Accountant Member hears and decides appeals. The more important case are
heard by a bench of 3 or 5 members. The cases where the total income
assessed does not exceeds one lakh rupees (with effect from 1st October,
1998 give lakhs rupees) may be heard and decided by a single Member.
Where possible, Tribunal will hear and decide appeal within a period of
four years from the end of the financial year in which appeal is filed.
The Assessing Officer, not satisfied with the order of the first Appellate
Authority, may also file an appeal with the Tribunal after necessary
authorization to file such an appeal is received from the Commissioner. No
fee is required to be paid for filing of appeal by the Department.
Where the assessee has not filed an appeal and the Department does, the
assessee may file a cross objection within thirty days of the receipt of the
notice of departmental appeal. The cross objection is required to be filed
in Form No.36A. No fee is required to be paid by the assessee for filing the
cross objection before the Tribunal.
With a view to check frivolous appeals, from 1June, 1999, Tribunal is
empowered to award costs of appeal.
The Appellate Tribunal is under the administrative control of Ministry of
Law.
^Top
Reference to High Court
- The Tribunal is the last fact finding authority under the
Income-tax Act, 1961. The order of the Appellate Tribunal is final
so far as facts are concerned. However, if a question of law arises
out of the order of Tribunal and the tax payer is not satisfied with
the decision of the Tribunal on the question of law, he can make an
application to the Tribunal in the prescribed Form No. 37 to refer
to question of law to the High Court for its opinion in respect of
appellate orders passed by Tribunal before 1st October, 1998. The
application should be accompanied by a fee of two hundred rupees.
The application should be presented to the Tribunal within sixty
days from the date of the tax payers is served with the Tribunals
order.
- If the Tribunal refuses to state the case to the High Court under
the I.T. Act, the assessee can within six months from the date he is
served with the order of refusal (this period is 90 days for W.T.
references) apply to the High Court for direction tot eh Tribunal to
state the case and refer it to the High Court for its opinion. If
the High Court so directed, the Tribunal shall refer the question of
law to the High Court for its opinion.
- After the decision of High Court is received the Tribunal
modifies its order in terms of the opinion given by the High Court.
- Where there is a conflict in the decision of High Courts in
respect of any particular question of law arising from appellate
order of Tribunal made before 1st October, 1998, the Appellate
Tribunal may draw up a statement of case and refer it through its
President direct to the Supreme Court for its opinion.
|
^Top
Third appeal to the High Court
In respect of appellate orders passed by the Tribunal on or after 1st
October, 1998, the assessee can file an appeal to the High Court if the case
involves a substantial question of law. The appeal to High Court will lie
not on any question of law but only in respect of a substantial question of
law. The appeal to High Court will lie only, if the High Court is satisfied
that the case involves a substantial question of law. The High Court will
hear the appeal in respect of a substantial question of law which is
formulated by the High Court.
The Memorandum of appeal before the High Court should state the substantial
question of law involved in the case. The appeal to High Court is required
to be filed within 120 days from the date on which the order appealed
against is received by the appellant. The Memorandum of appeal should
accompany the court fee for filing appeals to High Court.
The appeal will be heard by the High Court by a bench of not less than two
judges and shall be decided by the majority of the judges.
Relevant provisions of Code of Civil Procedure shall apply
mutates-muntandis to these appeals before High Court.
^Top
Fourth appeal to the Supreme Court
- If the assessee is not satisfied with the decision given by the
High Court on a question of law referred to it, he may file an
appeal before the Supreme Court against the judgement of the High
Court. Such appeal can only be filed before the Supreme Court if the
High court certifies it to be a fit case for appeal to the Supreme
Court. The application before the High Court for certificate of
fitness should be field within 60 days.
- Where the High Court refuses to grant such a certificate, the
assessee can under Article 136 of the constitution file a Special
Leave Petition before the Supreme Court. If the Special Leave
Petition to appeal is granted, the Supreme court will hear and
decide the appeal on merits.
- The procedure outlined above in regard to appeals to High court
and the Supreme Court under the Income-tax Act applies
mutates-mutandis to appeals under Wealth-tax Act as well.
|
^Top
Advance Ruling
- With a view to avoiding disputes in respect of assessment of
Income-tax liability of non-residents, the Income-tax Act provides
that a non-resident assessee can apply to Authority for Advance
Ruling at Delhi and obtain a ruling in advance in respect of the
transaction specified by the non-resident. This ruling is binding on
the Income-tax authorities and the non-resident who seeks the ruling
in respect of that transaction.
- With effect from 1st October, 1998 the notified residents can
also approach the Authority for Advance Ruling.
- The person seeking the advance ruling should made an application
in Form No.34 C along with a fee of Rs.2,500/- (Rupees two thousand
five hundred only) through a bank draft in favour of the Authority
for Advance Ruling payable at New Delhi.
|
^Top
Competent authority for disputes under double tax
avoidance agreements
India has entered into double taxation avoidance agreements with several
countries. If a foreign tax payer is aggrieved by the actions of the tax
authorities, under these agreements he can present his case to the Competent
Authority which is Ministry of Finance (Department of revenue), Joint
Secretary, Foreign Tax Division, North Block, New Delhi. The time limit for
making reference to the Competent Authority is three years from the
taxation complained against. This course is available to a foreign tax payer
in addition to normal appellate formus in respect of assessment orders.
^Top
No appeal against pre-emptive purhcase
Order of the Appropriate Authority for pre-emptive purchase of immovable
property are final and no appeal is provided against these orders.
^Top
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts barred
In view of the elaborate appellate system provided under Direct Tax Laws,
the Jurisdiction of Civil Courts is barred. No suit can be filed in any
Court against order made under the Direct Tax Laws.
^Top